The high-level commission formed to probe the atrocities committed to suppress the April movement of the country has submitted its report to Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala at his official residence in Baluwatar this morning.
Monday, November 20, 2006
The high-level commission formed to probe the atrocities committed to suppress the April movement of the country has submitted its report to Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala at his official residence in Baluwatar this morning.
The meeting of the House of Representatives (HoR) Sunday unanimously passed the proposal to consider over Nepal Water Supply Corporation Third Amendment Bill-2063 and the Petroleum Products Transaction Bill-2063 BS.
“This is not a normal situation, so promulgation of a new law will authorise the government to take actions against those who used excessive force to suppress the April movement,” Aryal said. He said questions might arise over promulgation of a law with retrospective effect but in situations like this promulgation of such law can be justified.
Aryal said this while delivering a lecture at a workshop on administrative law, organised by the students of Masters in Public Administration, first year.
Aryal said consensus among all the political forces is necessary to take actions against those found guilty of using force to suppress movement, as stated in the report prepared by the High-Level Investigation Commission.
Implementation of regular law is not sufficient to resolve serious problems in the country, he said.
Registrar of the Supreme Court, Dr Ram Krishna Timalsena, said promulgation of a law with retrospective effect can pave way to take actions against anyone responsible for carrying out any crime in the past.
Sunday, November 19, 2006
"The commission will submit its report to Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala at his official residence at Baluwatar tomorrow morning," said Dilli Raman Acharya, the HLPC spokesperson.
Grave differences surfaced among the commission members on the process for recommending action against "King Gyanendra and other highly-placed people", who the commission has reportedly found "guilty" of suppressing the April movement and misusing state funds during the direct royal rule.
Two members of the commission, Ram Kumar Shrestha and Dr. Kiran Shrestha, had walked away from the meeting held at the commission's office last week to finalize its report.
One of the commission members, Ram Kumar Shrestha said HLPC Coordinator Krishna Jung Rayamajhi objected to the idea of recommending the government to formulate necessary laws to "punish King Gyanendra for his role in suppressing the April uprising."
"I did not sign the final report as I was not allowed to express my note of dissent over the discriminatory actions recommended against the Janaandolan suppressors in the report," said Shrestha.
"I am of the view that all the suppressors, those who designed the crackdown and those who executed it on the streets, be held equally responsible," said Shrestha hinting at the king.
Saying that the HLPC members were still divided over the issue of recommending action against the king, Shrestha added that he would make "all the contentious issues" public tomorrow if he would not be allowed to table his "note of dissent."
According to Shrestha, the other commission members including coordinator Rayamajhi recommended that the report should hold the king responsible for the April atrocities, but should not recommend the formulation of laws required to punish him.
Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala has already said that the government can take action against the king if the HLPC indicts the latter in its report. Talking to media persons at his hometown residence in Biratanagar on Saturday, the PM had said that the government was ready to take "any decision" considering the current situation and national interest. "We will have to find a way to take action against the king if the commission so recommends," the PM had said.
Earlier last week, news report quoted unnamed commission members as saying that the commission has concluded that the king, as the then Chairman of the Council of Ministers, should take responsibility for the atrocities committed during the April mass rebellion.
Similarly, the commission has recommended corruption charges against former vice-chairmen Dr Tulsi Giri and Kirti Nidhi Bista and ministers Tanka Dhakal, Sris Shumshere Rana and Badri Mandal.
The commission is reported to have recommended strong action, on charges ranging from murder to corruption, against the then chiefs of the security wings.
The commission, formed in May 2006 immediately after the success of the April uprising, had interrogated 296 persons. And it has prepared recommendations for necessary action against around 200 persons, holding them responsible for atrocities committed during the April movement in which 19 people were killed and over 5,000 injured.
Saturday, November 18, 2006
A meeting of House of Representative, Population and Social Committee, held Friday unanimously passed the Nepal Health Service Act-2053 Amendment Bill -2063 BS and the Medical Science National Academy Bill- 2063 BS.The committee has said the meeting held under the chairmanship of Committee Chairman Birodh Khatiwada passed the bills.Meanwhile, the meeting of the House of Representatives (HoR), Population and Social Committee on Friday has unanimously passed the Bill-2061 BS and the Bill-2062 BS that were formulated to amend Nepal Health Service Act-2053 BS and to set provisions regarding National Academy for Medical Science, , respectively.The meeting presided over by Chairman of the Committee Birodh Khatiwada has passed the Bills, today, said the Committee.
The Investigation panel headed by appellate court judge Lokendra Malik formed to find the whereabouts of three missing persons today publicly called people to provide information if they have any information about the whereabouts of Rajendra Prasad Dhakal, Bipin Bhandari and Dil Bahadur Rai. The trio has been missing.“We have appealed to people to provide clues to us if they have any so that we can find whereabouts of missing people,” Chairman of the commission, Mallik, told journalists at a press conference organised by the panel on friday.
Dhakal is missing since more then ten years and the whereabouts of the other two are not known since the past three years. Responding to habeas corpus cases, a division bench of SC justices Khil Raj Regmi and Kalyan Shrestha had set up the panel to investigate into the cases.
The panel is preparing to investigate police offices and army barracks and to interrogate security officials to find out the whereabouts of the missing people.
The government, on May 12, had suspended Inspector General of Nepal Police Shyam Bhakta Thapa, AIGPs Rajendra Bahadur Singh, Rup Sagar Moktan and Krishna Basnet
IG of the Armed Police Force Sahabir Thapa, APF-AIG Rabiraj Thapa and APF-Senior Superintendents Durja Kumar Rai and Madhab Thapa, who were suspended on the same charges, are yet to join their duties because their suspension term is yet to end.
Meanwhile, Khul Bahadur Kunwar, 46, and Yagya Bahadur KC, 40 lost their jobs and served four years and seven years in jail respectively, after the Special Police Court found them guilty of stealing two revolvers from the Arsenal of the then Mid-Regional Police Training Centre, Maharajgunj, which they were guarding, when the weapons went missing.
After serving 15 years, in 2003, one Ghanashyam Adhikari, a former policeman, approached them separately and revealed the fact that it was he who had stolen the revolvers from the Arsenal they were guarding and said sorry for whatever they had to undergo due to his action. He also submitted a revolver he had stolen to the police.
Police arrested Adhikari the same year and the Special Police Court found him guilty of stealing the revolvers. Now, Adhikari is serving a jail term of four years for the crime he committed 15 years ago.
After knowing that the court has found Adhikari guilty of stealing the revolvers, the two disgraced policemen took up a legal battle to win their lost glory, the same year.
Kunwar and KC appealed to the Regional Police Special Court (RPSC), Patan, demanding an order to the Nepal Police to reinstate their jobs and provide them with due compensation.
At the backdrop of Adhikari owning the crime and same Court convicting him on the charge, Kunwar and KC appealed to the Regional Police Special Court (RPSC), Patan, demanding a order to Police Organisation for reinstatement of their job and compensation in 2003.
Responding to the petition, the RPSC had asked the then Kathmandu District Police Office (KDPO) — now called Metropolitan Police Range (MPR), Hanumandhoka, to clarify the court about the issue and the claim made by the two policemen. The KDPO, however, didn't furnish any reply saying it has no records dating back to 1988.
The two policemen, with help of Centre for Victims of Torture (CEVICT), came to the Metropolitan Police Range to pressurise the police officials to reply at the earliest to the RPSC.Sharad Oli, Deputy Superintendent of Police at the MPR, said they have already replied to the Court saying they don't have any record of the case.
"We can help them if the Court orders formation of an investigation committee and proceed the case," he said. Kunwar and KC said all they wanted was justice. "We want justice," they echoed.
The CEVICT, meanwhile, has said that the duo were extremely tortured and made to confess to the crime they never committed and that it has filed a complaint at the National Human Rights Commission demanding action against the police personnel who tortured them.
The High Level Investigation Commission headed by former Supreme Court Justice Krishna Jung Rayamajhi could not submit its report to Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala on friday as the PM was in Biratnagar.
Commission officials have been told the PM would receive the report probably on Monday. A majority of members of the commission had signed the report yesterday although two members of the commission Ram Prasad Shrestha and Dr Kiran Shrestha had refused to sign on the final report.
Rayamajhi had given a chance to the two members to sign on the report, but they did not attend office today.“Rayamajhi had told us either to sign or submit a report separately but we had no time to prepare a separate report,” said Ram Kumar.
He has been accusing Rayamajhi and the majority group of trying to save the King, the former ministers, and the security chiefs as he claimed that the majority group does not want stringent action taken against them.Ram Kumar is against the government’s acceptance of the report.
According to him the report has no value. “Since its tenure expired yesterday, how can the government accept it as it has no legal validity today,” he said. Ram Kumar, representative of the NC who had, along with another member, Dr Kiran, walked out of the commission meeting yesterday, accused the majority group of adopting a discriminatory policy.
However, another NC representative in the commission, Harihar Birahi, said: “People will know the truth when the government makes the report public”.
The report has recommended the government to prosecute all the members of the erstwhile council of ministers led by King Gyanendra on charge of corruption.
But the report does not recommended prosecution of them on murder charge saying that they had not opened fire against anyone and their involvement cannot be established in court.
Friday, November 17, 2006
A day after it acquitted a ‘tainted’ former minister of corruption charges, the Special Court gave clean chit to former minister Govinda Raj Joshi, dismissing a corruption charge lodged by the Commission for Investigation of Abuse of Authority (CIAA) against him.
A three-member bench comprising Chairman of the Special Court Bhupadhoj Adhikari and judges Komal Nath Sharma and Cholendra Shumsher Rana cleared Joshi of corruption charges.
The CIAA had on the basis of the report of the Judicial Inquiry Commission on Property (JICP) filed a case at the Special Court, accusing the former minister of amassing Rs30 million without disclosing its source by misusing his authority as then minister.
The court had remanded him in custody for a few days at the request of the anti-graft body but he secured release as the trial continued.
The CIAA had arrested Joshi, a Nepali Congress leader, from his house on October 13, 2003. He held home and education portfolios in different governments in the past.
Two members of the High Level Probe Commission, Ram Kumar Shrestha and Dr. Kiran Shrestha have refused to sign the final report expressing dissatisfaction over what they called as 'feeble' recommendation, particularly in relation with the action against the King and other top officials.
The disagreement erupted after the final report of the commission recommended action against the former home minister Kamal Thapa; royal advisors Satchit SJB Rana and Sharad Chandra Shah; former army chief Pyara Jung Thapa; former police chief Shyam Bhakta Thapa; former armed police chief Sahabir Thapa; and former chief of National Investigation Department Deviram Sharma only on the charge of misusing state coffer instead of slapping them charges of murder.
Shrestha duo refused to sign the minute of the meeting of the Commission on Thursday even though other members signed it in preparation of its formal submission to the Prime Minister on Friday. They also accused majority members of trying to protect the King from facing tough action. They were dissatisfied after the Commission report failed to firmly recommend action against the King despite finding him guilty of repression. Ram Kumar Shrestha said that they did not sign the report because its recommendations were not tough enough and could provide impunity to main culprits.
The High-Level Investigation Commission headed by former Supreme Court Justice Krsihna Jung Rayamajhi on Thursday said its report on the suppression of the April mass movement and killings won't be made public.The commission will submit the report to Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala on Friday.
"We will not make the report public," Rayamajhi told . He added that as there are serious matters in the report, publicising it may affect the law and order situation.
Rayamajhi said they finalised the report on Thursday and sought Koirala's time for its submission. The panel took 184 days to complete its work.
Rayamajhi said the Probe Commission Act, 1969, does not allow the commission to make the report — a secret document — public. "We can, however, disclose limited information verbally," he said.
He also, however, said that he would suggest the Prime Minister to make the report accessible to people as it is a matter of public interest.
The commission has indicted King Gyanendra, members of the erstwhile cabinet, chiefs of security agencies and high-ranking security officials. It has also decided to recommend the government to prosecute on murder charges former Home Minister Kamal Thapa and those who issued shoot orders during the agitation.
President of Nepal Bar Association, Shambhu Thapa, however, criticised the idea of keeping the report a secret and called on the government to respect the rights of the people. "If the government wants to respect the right to information of the people, the report must be made public," Thapa told
."This is a public document and as such it must be made public as per article 16 of the 1990 Constitution and in accordance with the emerging principle of right to information and to promote the rule of law," he said.
Advocate Upendra Keshari Neupane also suggested the government publicise the report and implement it's suggestions so that it does not meet the same fate as that of the Mallik Commission report. The Mallik Commission was formed to investigate the suppression of the 1990 movement. However, its recommendations were never implemented.
President of the Federation of Nepalese Journalists Bishnu Nisthuri also objected to the idea of keeping the report a secret. "This is against the spirit of the Jana Andolan-II," he told .
Mainwhile Serious differences arose among members of the High-Level Investigation Commission over the recommendation to the government to take action against the king, former ministers and chiefs of security agencies.
While a majority of the members of the panel decided to submit the report to the PM, two members Ram Kumar Shrestha and Dr Kiran Shrestha accused them of trying to save the king and the officials from facing stringent action.
Though they did not write a formal note of dissent , they objected to the idea of the majority of the members.“We went against the proposal of the majority as they have tried to protect the King, the former ministers and the chiefs of security agencies,” Shrestha told .
He and Dr Shrestha did not sign the minute and walked out of the meeting. However, the majority of the members decided to stick to the plan of submitting the report.
Shrestha alleged that the majority was against charging former ministers, including Kamal Thapa, and the security chiefs, under murder charge, and wanted them to be prosecuted under corruption charge.
However, another member of the commission claimed that Ram Kumar and Dr Shrestha were trying to hinder the decision making process.
The majority also claimed that Ram Kumar is close to the chief of the Nepali Army Rookmangud Katawal and he was trying to obstruct the process and that Ram Kumar always created problems while the commission was doing its job.
“The truth is that the two members want the officials prosecuted on corruption charges and not on murder charges,” a member in the majority group said.
He said the commission would go ahead and recommend prosecuting the officials on murder charges as well.Another member Ram Prasad Shrestha said that the two members’ allegation that the majority of the members are trying to protect the king and the former officials is “totally baseless.”
Thursday, November 16, 2006
Wednesday, November 15, 2006
A three-member bench comprising chairman of the Special Court, Bhupadhoj Adhikari, and members Komal Nath Sharma and Cholendra Shumsher Rana gave clean chit to Khadka.
The CIAA had filed a corruption that a case against Khadka, a Nepali Congress (NC) leader, accusing him of amassing huge amount of property by misusing its position as then home minister.
The anti-graft body had accused him of embezzling Rs.23,687,634 during his tenure as a minister.
The Supreme Court Tuesday issued a show cause notice, asking the government why it had not taken action against the security personnel responsible for the death of human rights activist Dayaram Pariyar some eight months ago.
The single bench of justice Ram Prasad Shrestha issued the notice, responding to a writ petition filed by advocate Ratna Bahadur Bagchand on Monday. "Submit written details on why no action has yet been taken against the security man involved in Pariyar's killing," the SC order said.
A police team, including Police Inspector Prakashraj Sharma, had opened indiscriminate fire at Janak chowk of Janakpur in April this year. The firing had killed Rastriya Prajatantra Party leader Ram Chandra Yadav on the spot and National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) official Pariyar died four days later while undergoing treatment in Kathmandu.
After a probe it carried out, the NHRC had recommended to the government to press criminal charges against the security man who had shot Pariyar. But the government has not taken any action against the allegedly guilty policeman.
The Head of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Nepal (OHCHR-Nepal), Lena Sundh on Wednesday reiterated that the OHCHR-Nepal would do the utmost to support the parties’ endeavours in the peace process and would continue to monitor the human rights situation in Nepal as requested by the political parties.
The newly-appointed head of the OHCHR-Nepal who arrived in Kathmandu on Monday, in a press meet today said, “I am pleased to be here in Nepal and lead a dedicated team.”
An expert in conflict management and peacekeeping with a 30-year-long international career, Sundh was appointed the head of the OHCHR-Nepal on October 18.
Sundh speaking today at her first press conference within the capacity of the head of the OHCHR-Nepal, said, “I assure that OHCHR-Nepal will continue its work in different districts of Nepal to monitor human rights situation. Our human rights officials in five development regions will continuously monitor the human rights situation across the country through capacity building and technical assistance.”
Sundh also stressed that all the parties must abide by the November 8 agreement and the OHCHR-Nepal will continuously monitor the implementation after the comprehensive peace agreement is signed by the government and the Maoists.
Emphasising on the establishment of rule of law, Sundh said, “The rule of law is the foundation and nobody can be above the law. The impunity must end. Ending impunity remains one of the biggest human rights challenges for Nepal.”
Sundh termed the formation of the high-level truth and reconciliation commission a positive step and underscored that the commission must be independent, credible and strong. Sundh also pointed out that the National Human Rights Commission in Nepal must be strong, impartial and independent.
Stating that the voices of dalits, janjatis, women and other marginalised people must be addressed, Sundh said that during the transitional phase, it is necessary that their human rights must be guaranteed.
"When the peace process begins, installing the parliament and the government is not the ultimate aim but is the beginning", said Sundh, adding, "By respecting the human rights of the people of Nepal, parties can establish conducive environment for CA elections."
Mainwhile The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has requested the Maoists not to violate the agreement with the Seven Party Alliance (SPA).A complaint had been filed at the Commission which said that the Maoists forcefully transferred the registration of the land belonging to Madan Mandal Khatwe of Simara-5 in Sarlahi to that of Akalesh Mandal two weeks ago, the Commission said.
The High-level Investigation Commission headed by former Supreme Court Justice Krishna Jung Rayamajhi has found King Gyanendra guilty of suppression and killing of people during Jana Andolan II. The commission has decided to urge the government and parliament to take necessary steps against the King as no law permits action against him.
The commission, which spent 184 days to complete its investigation, is to submit its report on Friday to Prime Minister GP Koirala.
“We have decided to recommend the parliament to take necessary steps against the King as we found him guilty,” a highly placed commission source told . He also added that they have said that though the King did not respond to the commission’s questionnaire, it does not mean he did no wrong. This is the first time in Nepal’s history that a commission has found a king guilty.
“Since he was the chairman of the council of ministers, we found him responsible for all the decisions taken by the cabinet,” the source added.
The commission specifically recommended the government to take strong action against the members of the King’s cabinet and the chiefs of the security agencies who had ordered use of excessive force to suppress Jana Andolan II.According to a member of the commission, Ram Prasad Shrestha, the report will be submitted to PM Girija Prasad Koirala on Friday.
It had quizzed 294 persons for violating human rights and misuse of national treasury.
It has named some security personnel for ordering the shooting of demonstrators and decided to recommend prosecution of them on charge of murder. “Around 150 persons were found guilty of killing and suppressing the people,” the source added.
The commission also held the then vice-chairmen of the council of ministers Dr Tulsi Giri and Kirtinidhi Bista, Home Minister Kamal Thapa and other ministers guilty of violating human rights. The commission will ask the government and the parliament to promulgate a law so that they can be prosecuted on charge of abusing human rights, as currently there is no specific law to prosecute anyone on charge of human rights abuse.
The commission named certain officials and recommended dismissal, demotion and departmental action against them.
Many ministers and regional administrators have been found guilty of misusing state treasury.
The commission has decided to recommend that they be prosecuted under Anti-corruption Act, 2002, a commission member said. It is also going to suggest prosecution under Muluki Ain 1963 of the security officials who had issued shoot orders on demonstrators.
Tuesday, November 14, 2006
A member of the Council told that Chief Justice is yet to form a panel to investigate the Patan Appellate Court’s recently controversial stay order that barred Nepal Rastra Bank from intervening in the management of Nepal Bangladesh Bank Limited.
“We have suggested him to from a inquiry panel as per the Judicial Council Act 1990,” said a JC member.
Following the controversy stirred by the stay order, the NB Bank had withdrawn the case from the Patan Appellate Court and the Rastra Bank took over its management.
Monday, November 13, 2006
They advised the Parliamentary State Affairs Committee (SAC) that there was no need of issuing naturalised citizenship certificate to anyone. A few experts also opposed the idea of adopting the cut-off date for distributing citizenship.
“Why has the government proposed such a provision to provide naturalised citizenship to create a burden for the country? It will result in population growth,” said Shambhu Thapa, president of the Nepal Bar Association. He added that honourary citizenship would be sufficient if any foreigners contributed to the nation.
The SAC today held a discussion with lawmakers, leaders and legal experts on the provisions of the proposed Bill.Former president of the NBA Harihar Dahal said that the citizenship problem of the Madheshis should be resolved but non-Nepalese should not be issued citizenship certificates. He also added that 1990 should be made the cut-off year to solve the problem.
Advocate Kamal Naryan Das suggested that the date of promulgation of the new Citizenship Act can be recognised as the cut-off date.
Senior advocate Shree Hari Aryal advised the government to adopt a provision not to appoint a naturalised citizen in any policy-level posts. Advocate Prakash Osti claimed that the idea of providing citizenship by birth and with the recommendation of three people cannot solve the problem
Speaker Subas Nembang said the House was doing serious homework to solve the citizenship problem before the constituent assembly elections. “This is the problem of the entire nation. This should be resolved before the CA polls,” Nembang added.
Home Minister Krishna Prasad Situala said the seven-party alliance and the Maoists have agreed to solve the citizenship problem. He said the Home Ministry will send teams to the districts to provide citizenship certificates immediately after the Bill is passed.
The Forum for Women, Law and Development (FWLD) on sunday said that the government has failed to implement the Supreme Court verdicts issued in favour of women.
She claimed that her organisation has filed a contempt of court case in the SC against the government authorities for not obeying the apex court verdict to form a panel to study about gender discrimination. “This is the worst situation that the authorities are not seriously implementing court verdicts,” she added.
Sunday, November 12, 2006
Advocate Dinesh Tripathi was invited as a guest speaker to deliver a talkin a New York University on “violation of international law in Nepal.”. He spoke on the occasion that "There is massive violation of international human rights laws and international humanitarian laws are taking place in Nepal. Nepal had ratified all the major international human rights instruments but implementation part is extremely weak in the Nepal. There is massive non-compliance with the international human rights norms in the Nepal."
April movement was a huge success and one of the historic events in Nepal but evil forces are conspiring to undermine the mandate of April movement. Nepal needs to fully integrate with international human rights regime and aspiration of full freedom and genuine democracy of Nepalese peoples need to be respected. It is the irony of Nepali history that no action has taken against any perpetrator and violator. Recent agreements between seven party alliances are historic and positive one but lot depends on the sincere implementation of the agreement. Nepal can not afford violence and war.
Genuine, just and democratic peace is the need of the hour in Nepal. International community and civil society has to be watchful on Nepal and support the full democratization and integration with the international human rights regime. International big power should not conspire against the will of Nepalese people and at the expense of people of Nepal should not support king and military. People of Nepal aspiring for full and genuine democracy and want to get rid of monarchy and all the feudal institution. International power should respect and allow to prevail the will of the people of Nepal. United nation has an extremely important role to play in Nepal and closely monitor the peace process . United Nation should use its resource and expertise to facilitate to build a genuine peace in the Nepal. It has to enhance it’s capability to effectively tackle the situation. International criminal tribunal need to be set up to conduct trial against the perpetrator. State and Maoist both need to abide by international human rights norms. Violation of international human rights norms and humanitarian norms shall not be allowed at any cost. Human rights and human dignity is the paramount. Military need to be fully democratized and fully put under civilian control. Total restructuring of the state is the need of the hour. People want a massive and positive change in order to build more just and fair socio- economic order. We the people of Nepal shall allow writing our own constitution and allow being the master of our own fate. New constitution should not only establish a political democracy but it also establishes a social and economic democracy too.
In the country like Nepal Political democracy is essential but it is not enough. We need a vast socio-economic restructuring of the society. Our democracy must be inclusive and equitable and guarantee not only the civil and political rights of people but economic, social and cultural rights of people. In order to build genuine human rights culture in south Asia we need to have south Asian court of human rights. South Asian leader should show their political will to adopt south Asian human rights charter. It would be the biggest safeguard for south Asian people against military and undemocratic regime. Since it is an era of globalization of human rights so south Asia region should not be lagging behind in this context.
Friday, November 10, 2006
State cannot run without a head :Ex-minister
Nilambar Acharya, the Law Minister of the interim government that promulgated the 1990 constitution, on Thursday said that a state cannot run without a head of the state and, therefore, the king must be respected as the acting head of state during the transitional phase.
"A state should have a head of the state, even during the transitional phase," he said adding that it is against the rule of the separation of powers and checks and balances if there is no head of the state and an executive head or other state organ chief works as the head.
Acharya was speaking at a programme on Role of 1990 Constitution for the Development of Nepal's Constitutional Process organised by Constitutional Lawyers Forum here today. He also claimed that the principle of separation of power and check and balance and the fundamental rights adopted in the 1990 Constitution are very good provisions.
"The king had exercised all powers, which was given to the executive. However, he authorised himself to formalise the decisions as the head of the state," he added. Acharya also said the king now has no authority to make appointments or give consent to any decision, " he added.
He said that now King Gyanendra is like the kings in Mustang and Manang.
Legal expert Yuba Raj Sangroula said the 1990 Constitution failed because it could not adopt any provision guaranteeing the economic rights of the people, which he said was the most essential rights in modern period.
Yash Ghai, professor of Hong Kong University, said the 1990 Constitution could not include the ethnicity issues, which rendered it a failure. He underscored the necessity of a new constitution to solve the problem.
President of Nepal Bar Association, Shambhu Thapa criticised the idea of adopting a provision to decide about the fate of the King by a simple majority. He said that it would be better to decide on such a major issue by referendum.
173 discriminatory laws still in force :FWLD
There are at least 173 legal provisions, 110 schedules and over 450 instances of use of languages cutting across 83 different laws that discriminate against women, the Forum for Women, Law and Development (FWLD) said in a report titled ‘An Update of Discriminatory Laws in Nepal and Their Impact on Women’.
The Speaker approved the Acts to Amend Some Gender Equality Laws – 2063 on November 6. However, the amendment deals with only 56 legal provisions cutting across 83 different Acts.
According to the report, discriminatory laws cover issues like citizenship rights, property rights, marriage and family, nationality, legal and court proceedings, trafficking and sexual abuse, employment, education and identity.
Meera Dhungana, an advocate at the FWLD, said: “More laws need to be amended to ensure gender parity.” Previous laws on inheritance of ancestral property discriminated against women.
“The change is reflected in a legal provision, which says an unmarried daughter has equal right over the ancestral property. She does not have to return her share of property after marriage,” she said. “The amendment has widened the definition of rape. The law takes any forced sexual activity by a husband as an instance of rape,” said advocate Sabin Shrestha, who is also associated with the FWLD.
An errant hubby could be jailed for three to six months and a wife can file for divorce, citing forced sexual activity. Though the amended Act does not recognise citizenship rights of women, another bill on Integration and Amendment of Nepal’s Citizenship Laws is under consideration.
Court building inaugurated
Inaugurating the newly constructed building of the District Court, Rupandehi, at Siddarthnagar municipality-7, Chief Justice Dilip Kumar Poudel on thrusday said it is the courts’ duty to provide justice to all without discrimination and bias. Poudel urged the juries to be honest in their work.He told it is the responsibility of the courts to provide prompt and quality justice to the people.
Saying that justice is synonymous with truth and equality, Poudel said biased and discriminatory activities don’t come under the definition of justice.
“The court and juries should always remain in favour of truth and justice”, Poudel said, adding, “The only objective of the justice system should be to provide free and fair verdicts.”
Drafting of info bill in final stage: Official
The Right to Information Bill, the drafting of which is in final stage, has a provision of penalising those officials who withhold information of public interest, Kashi Raj Dahal, coordinator for the Right to Information Bill Drafting Committee, said on thrusday.
“We are doing our best to draft the bill as per international standards. The bill will not let any official withhold information of public interest,” Dahal said at Martin Chautari .
He said the government will table the bill in the House of Representatives next week. He said the drafting of the bill is in final stages. The committee is consulting with different government officials and other stakeholders about the bill, he said.
“We have proposed the formation of an Information Commission, where people can file complaints if government and other institutions refuse to disseminate information,” he said.
Meanwhile, Minister of State for Information and Communications Dilendra Prasad Badu met members of the committee and acquired information about the bill.
Thursday, November 09, 2006
The government has already cancelled the official observance of Constitution Day – which used to be held every year on Kartik 23 (November 9 this year).
The government has also cancelled this day as a public holiday. In the past years, this day used to be celebrated by the government as well as civil society organizations by organizing interactions on constitutionalism.
However, following the successful April uprising and the popular demand for holding Constituent Assembly to write a new constitution, the 1990 Constitution has been losing its significance even though officially it is still operational. The 1990 Constitution was a product of historic People's Movement of 1990, which restored democracy by replacing autocratic Panchayat system.
Acting upon a petition filed by managing director of the NBBL Narendra Bhattarai, a single bench of Judge Keshav Prasad Mainali issued the stay order following a hearing, Wednesday.
The bench told the NRB not to order the NBBL to stop its activities. The bench also ordered the NRB governor to submit a written explanation, clarifying why it is trying to take action against the NB Group within 15 days.
The governor of NRB on Monday had endorsed a proposal declaring NBBL a troubled bank and forwarded it to a meeting of NRB Board of Directors planned for Wednesday for final approval.
According to sources, NBBL went to the Court after one of the responsible officers of the NRB leaked the information of proposed action against NBBL management.
Nepal Credit and Commerce Bank and NBBL are members of the NB Group.
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued a mandamus order directing the government authorities to review the fare of public buses only after analysing all the factors related to public transport business.
The order issued by the division bench of justices Min Bahadur Rayamajhi and Pawan Kumar Ojha has even asked the government to publicize the revised fares in the gazette.
Acting upon a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by advocate Jyoti Baniya on behalf of Consumers' Protection Forum, the bench directed the Office of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, the Ministry of Transport Management, the Department of Transportation and Management and the National Transport Entrepreneurs' Association and the Nepal Transport Entrepreneurs' Association to review public transport fares.
The bench directed the authorities fix the fare rates by analysing the price of engine, petroleum products, administrative costs, tax and benefits for the entrepreneurs.
As per the current practice, the Department of Transport Management fixes public transport fares on the recommendation of the Fare Determination Committee.
The petitioner challenged the previous system saying that it was an unscientific way of fixing the fares of public transport.
The Supreme Court has also asked the government to ensure mandatory insurance for the commuters using public transportation
Tuesday, November 07, 2006
Transparency International’s corruption perceptions index 2006 (CPI) has ranked Nepal in the 121st position indicating rampant corruption in the country.
The report, made public on Monday, said no improvement was made in Nepal on the corruption front. The score of 10 indicates a corruption-free country and Nepal managed to score only 2.5 points, the same as in 2005.
In preparing the CPI for 2005 and 2006, TI used 12 independent surveys and listed 163 countries accordingly to survey findings.
To rank Nepal, TI used five surveys done by the World Bank, the Economist, Merchant Group, WEF and WMRC.
The surveys studied the level of corruption in Nepal, efforts to curb it, misuse of state resources, corruption in government and probability of corruption.
The report ranked Finland, Iceland and New Zealand as the cleanest among the 163 nations it covered with 9.6 points while Haiti was perceived as the most corrupt country in the world with 1.9 points.
Among South Asian Nations, Bhutan is the cleanest with 6 points, while Bangladesh is the most corrupt with 2 points. The CPI ranks Pakistan and Bangladesh as more corrupt countries than Nepal.
Speaking at a programme organized to release the report, Transparency International Nepal’s executive Director Ashish Thapa stressed the need for the government to concentrate in amending constitutional and legal provisions and adopting transparency in the financial sector in order to control corruption.
Financial Bill - 2063 and Lumbini Bouddha University Bill - 2063, which were passed by House of Representatives (HoR), have been authenticated under clause 3 of Some Public Written Documents Certification (Procedures) Act, 2063 by Speaker of HoR, here Monday.
Monday's meeting unanimously approved the Some Nepal Acts Relating to Export and Import and Intellectual Property Amendment Bill- 2063 BS.
At the meeting, Home Minister Krishna Prasad Sitaula presented the 16th annual report of the Commission for Investigation of Abuse of Authority(CIAA).
RSS
Monday, November 06, 2006
Friday, November 03, 2006
Justice Anup Raj Sharma emerging out of the meeting said that nobody has the right to review any verdict once already made by the Supreme Court. Sharma said, “We have always said that theoretically, there is no such provision to review the SC’s verdict once it is made.” However, he admitted it has its own provisions and processes to review any SC decision.
According to SC registrar Ram Krishna Timilsina, the judges present in the full court meeting opposed the PAC decision saying that the PAC has taken a decision outside its jurisdiction and the decision will ultimately affect the independence of the judiciary.
Even though the House itself can initiate impeachment action, the PAC has no right to recommend impeachment motion against the judges, Timilsina quoted the judges as saying.
The Parliamentary Account committee led by MP Chitra Bahadur KC, after studying the verdict, had on Sunday recommended the House to impeach the judges involved in the verdict saying that the verdict in the case was influenced and the judges involved were incapable of working as the SC judges.
Secretary General of the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), Nicholas Howen on Friday urged the seven-party government and the Maoists to give priority to human rights issues in the ongoing government-Maoists peace talks.
Wrapping up the five-day Nepal visit by an ICJ delegation, Howen, in a press conference organised in the capital today said that protection and respect of human rights are essential to hold constituent assembly elections to instate peace and stability in Nepal.
Emphasising on arms management, Howen said that Maoist excesses must be stopped at the earliest.
Howen also urged the government to strongly establish the rule of law in the country.
Earlier this morning, the ICJ delegation also met with Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala at his official residence at Baluwatar.
The ICJ delegation during the meeting with the PM drew his attention towards the violation of the Ceasefire Code of Conduct by the Maoists.
Completing its five-day Nepal visit, the delegation is returning today.
Sanjay Mahato, who had been in police custody on the charge of being involved in the murder of MP of Siraha, Krishna Charan Shrestha for the last 37 days, was released on date, Thursday.
Police had taken him into custody after his motorcycle was found to have been used by those assailants who had shot Shrestha dead.
He was released following the order of the District Court, Siraha.
Mahato has been claiming that his motorbike was forcibly taken by one of those involved in Shrestha's killing.
Although the brother of the deceased had filed a complaint with the police clearly mentioning the names of 10 persons allegedly involved in the murder, it was withdrawn later after locals pressurized him as Janatantrik Terai Mukti Morcha (JTMM) had already owned up the killing. After Shrestha's murder, irate locals had nabbed and lynched two of the fleeing murderers while a local was shot dead by the murderers in the incident on September 23.
Thursday, November 02, 2006
The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Nepal (OHCHR-Nepal) has called on the Maoists to stop their “law enforcement” activities around the country.
In a statement issued Wednesday, the UN rights body said, “The OHCHR-Nepal calls on CPN-Maoist to stop its “law enforcement” activities which have intensified recently especially in the Kathmandu Valley, and which have resulted in serious abuses of human rights.”
“OHCHR-Nepal considers these parallel “law enforcement” activities to be illegal, as well as in violation of international human rights standards to which CPN-Maoist has made repeated commitments,” the statement further said, reminding that these commitments included the directives issued as a result of the Maoist Central Committee meeting on 2 September, which explicitly stated that party cadres shall not conduct abductions, torture and ill-treatment. The meeting had decided that those responsible for such actions would be held accountable.
The rights watchdog mentioned that in its letter sent to the Maoist leadership on Tuesday, it had confirmed the abductions of 39 individuals in the districts of Bhaktapur, Lalitpur and Kathmandu in October alone.
The CPN-Maoist itself publicly declared on 21 October that more than 80 individuals had been taken into captivity, whom they accused of being linked to criminal activities.
According to the OHCHR-Nepal, Maoist cadres have held individuals incommunicado in hidden locations – thus increasing their vulnerability to human rights abuses. In September and October, OHCHR-Nepal made visits to eight places where the CPN-Maoist held individuals in captivity in the Kathmandu Valley. These places included several factory buildings occupied by the rebel party, and the offices of Maoist sister organisations, including the All Nepal Trade Union Federation (ANTUF) and the All Nepal Transport Workers Union (ANTWU). The OHCHR-Nepal said it has received reports of at least seven other locations in Kathmandu Valley used by the Maoists for the interrogation of individuals.
“OHCHR-Nepal has investigated a number of reports of ill-treatment and torture, including severe beatings. OHCHR-Nepal staff have witnessed serious injuries among those held captive by CPN-Maoist, consistent with claims of ill-treatment and torture,” the release said.
The OHCHR-Nepal also complained that Maoists had at times obstructed the officials from gaining immediate access to those in captivity.
“OHCHR-Nepal calls again on the CPN-Maoist leadership to stop all parallel ‘law enforcement’ activities, and especially incidents of torture and ill-treatment. State authorities have sole responsibility to arrest and detain criminal suspects, and it is essential for the re-establishment of the rule of law that all parties respect this,” the statement quoted Sandra Beidas, the Officer-in-Charge of OHCHR-Nepal, as saying.